“Undocumented workers broke our immigration laws, and I believe that they must be held accountable, especially those who may be dangerous.”
FLASHBACK 2001: Before Donald Trump The Left Accused Conservatives of Being “racist,” “homophobe,” “sexist,” “mean-spirited,” “insensitive” and much more . Related: Years Before Trump Ran, Democrats Labeled Republicans As Sub-Human Haters .
The psychology of Trump hate
The Left routinely pour out anger, hated and contempt towards Republican Presidents. The only near-exception was Ronald Reagan. He was very hard to hate so they mostly settled on contempt for him. He actually got all his transformative policies through a Democrat Congress!The Psychology of Trump Hate
But Trump has caused the hate to rise to a new level. The Left have exploded with hate during his Presidency. Even the tiniest thing Trump says or does is fodder for derogatory mention. The thing that symbolizes the Leftist attitude towards Trump for me is the icecream “affair”. At a small White House dinner for some journalists, Trump asked for an extra scoop of icecream with his dessert. The media went wild! How contemptible to ask for an extra scoop of icecream! Who does he think he is? Oliver Twist or something? The triviality of it is mind-blowing.The Psychology of Trump Hate
Much wisdom has been written about Trump hatred but I want to take an analysis of it down to the psychological level. I want to relate it to the basics of the Left-Right polarity. And at its psychological fons et origo the Left Right polarity is very simple. Conservatives are the contented people and Leftists are the discontented people. Conservatives don’t think the world is perfect but they can happily live with it. For Leftists, on the other hand, departures from the ideal burn them up. So how has Trump affected that?
When you are discontented with something you tend to be angry about it and want to change it. So we have the unending stream of mostly addled Leftist proposals for “reform”. What the proposals are varies almost from day to day but there is always that simmering discontent motivating them. The problems at the Southern border, for instance, went from non-existent to a humanitarian disaster almost overnight.
The sad thing is that the Left are mostly up against what philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz pointed out a couple of hundred years ago: Maybe we live in the best of all possible worlds. Leibnitz didn’t mean that seriously. He set it as a question that should be asked before we change something. The point being that some bad things are necessary to some good things and vice versa.
Current politics have a rather clear example of that. It would be good and nice and kind if we could abolish America’s borders — as the Left propose — and thus give all the poor of Latin America access to a better lifestyle. How good, kind and noble the Left are to propose such a beneficial change! The bad thing is that we cannot do that and must have defended borders if America is not to be flooded by people with the attitudes, values and customs that have made their own countries cesspits of violence and corruption. America already has plenty of troublesome people within its borders. The last thing it needs is more of them. Opening the borders (good) would lead to a widespread collapse in civility (bad)
So the Left are usually up against it. The arrangements that have stood the test of time are pretty much the best we can do. They are an existing balance that maximizes the good without falling too far into the bad. So any change will usually disrupt that and cause “unforeseen” bad side effects.
The bad effects are not however really “unforeseen. Conservatives foresee them regularly and warn Leftists about them. But the Left are so obsessed with the bad things that they see that they close their ears to any information that might distract them from the “good” that they want to do. So we have things like the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) that made health insurance UNaffordable for many. Conservatives certainly warned vigorously against it before its enactment and it got not one vote from the Right side of the house.
So the Left are constantly in a state of frustration. The “good” that they try to do almost always rebounds against them and causes them to become unpopular instead of popular — and loses them votes. Obamacare undoubtedly helped put Trump in office. Would anybody suddenly hit with $10,000 deductibles vote Democrat?
But the Left have gradually got some of their way over the years, despite the generally impoverishing effect of their policies. They have, for instance, got America to bow down before the false God of global warming despite the huge and futile cost of windmills, solar panels etc. Had all that money been spent on repairing and upgrading America’s roads, bridges and highways, everybody would have been much better off.
And the Obama/Clinton regime gave them hope of a lot of progress towards their imagined ideal world. Americans were regulated within an inch of their lives. The stage was set for the emergence of a new “sustainable” Eden. Obama had generated much ecstasy and Clinton was clearly committed to continue the march towards that new but elusive Eden where we would all be ants in a great Leftist anthill. From Hegel on that has been the Leftist vision.
But what they were up against was the wish of many Americans not to be antlike robots obeying every addled command from on high. The ever-changing enthusiasms of the Left were far from universally shared. And when Leftists see “racism” under every bed they certainly depart from how most Americans see things.
One thing that has changed little over the years is the Leftist obsession with race. Before WWII, they were for the white race, now they are against the white race but they remain racists. With “affirmative action” and “diversity” it is all about race for them. Almost comically, however, they deny being racists and constantly accuse everybody else of being racists. They explain their race consciousness as an attempt to do good so, in their simplistic way, any other thinking about racial differences is bad.
And they extend their intolerance of any groupthink other than their own to all sorts of groupthink by others. In particular they are very wary of patriotism and the idea that America is particularly admirable or exceptional.
Obama put it politely when he said during an April 2009 press conference: “I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism”. Coming from an American President that is remarkable. Most Americans love their country or are at least proud of it and expect to hear that echoed in the words of their President. Obama could on occasions bring himself to praise American ideals but praise for America as such was in short supply.
The above picture was from a 2007 political rally where the national anthem was being played. An ABC News video showed that Senator Obama did not salute at any time during the anthem and that everybody else on the platform did. His ignoring of the anthem was widely criticized so he learned from that and was more careful when he became President. But it is clear that his heart was just not in it.
Obama was noted for his politeness but most Leftists are not polite at all about any praise for America. They call it “racism”. Leftist Howard Zinn’s widely used textbook A People’s History of the United States is a catalog of America’s failings, real, exaggerated and imagined. As America is a famously patriotic country, Leftists do at election times make some pretence of patriotism but the frequency with which they prescribe Zinn’s textbook for the schools they control shows what they really think.
It is clear enough why anybody would be careful about racism. It is “good” to avoid excesses such as Hitler’s — but extending “racism” to include all forms of group consciousness is egregious.
So by the time of the election that brought Trump to power, many Americans had grown very tired of being lectured to and restricted by the Left. What to the Left were the first steps towards a new Eden were to many Americans an attempt to make them into something other than what they naturally were — and they were in a mood to rebel against it. And in particular they disliked the constant parade of accusations and condemnations about how “deplorable” America and Americans were.
So the election of Trump was to his followers a return to normal — a return to how they naturally felt and thought. They simply threw off the ever-tightening Leftist straitjacket that was trying to force them to be something that they were not. And because of their natural patriotic feelings they LOVED the man who liberated them to express that loudly and proudly again.
So now we can see why the Left hate Trump beyond all bounds. All their attempts to right the wrongs of the world as they see them have always failed. The Soviet attempt took a painfully long time to fail but it too in the end failed. But through their “long march” through American institutions it had begun to look as if they might now be building a lasting approach to a new Eden. And the Obama presidency seemed to be a culmination of that –bringing a clear victory to them at last. After lifetimes of failures they finally seemed to be getting there. Their dreams were on the brink of being realized.
Then Donald Trump took it all away. He destroyed their last great hope of permanent “reform”. He liberated people to be what they wanted to be rather than what the Left wanted them to be. And from the moment he became the Republican candidate his vigorous patriotism signalled that. He was clearly from the world that Leftists deplored. And almost as soon as he came to power he did the unthinkable by removing America’s obeisance to global warming — by withdrawing from the Paris “treaty”. The “treaty” was mostly just an empty gesture but Trump took even that away.
Thanks to the traitorous John McCain, Trump did not manage to get Obamacare abolished but he broke its backbone by getting the mandatory levy abolished. Obamacare ended up as no triumph anyway, as we see from the way that most of the current crop of Democrat presidential candidates are pushing “Medicare for all”. So there is nothing left for the Left. What should have been their great triumph lies as a shattered ruin at their feet.
So if someone had destroyed all your dreams just when your dreams seemed likely to be realized, would you not hate with a passion the man who snatched those dreams away? The Left are great haters so after what he took away from them, they hate Trump with all their being. Nothing that he does is forgiveable — JR.
Scott Adams has a list of “tells” that show when you’ve won an argument with a true believer.
I also learned three new things that I’m gonna share with you on persuasion. If you can get the person you’re debating with online or somewhere else to say one of these three things it means you won the debate…Real Coffee with Scott Adams, Ep. 593 (from auto-transcript, start at 11:13)
…When the other person says “blah blah blah full-stop” or “blah blah blah period” or “blah blah blah end of story” — if you hear any of those things “full stop”, “period”, “end of story”, it means you already won the debate because those are those are direct signals that somebody doesn’t want to hear any of the information…
If you were following me yesterday a few hundred of you were watching me interact with these people and slap them down you saw a lot of them would change the topic. So I would I would show conclusively that the President did not call the racists fine people because that’s the transcript. But they would not say “oh man I was wrong all along”.
Never. They changed the subject to “other people were there and they were bad. It’s just a different topic. So I used to chase them down the funnel and argue that but now I just declare victory and I just say I accept your surrender You also saw the word salad reply where somebody is their belief is debunked they get into cognitive dissonance and instead of just saying “oh yeah okay
right”, they start spewing words and sentences that almost sort of look like they could make sense but they don’t and that’s when you know you’ve won. They’ve just they’ve gone into the word salad category, And then the other thing is if they resort to anything that’s magic there and in this case the magic is the secret racist dog whistle. So a lot of people once they had had their world debunked on this topic don’t say “yeah sure yeah maybe he maybe he technically said the right thing but even though he technically said the right thing we’re pretty sure that he was sending a clear racist dog whistle”, When you hear that you can you can kind of declare a victory.
So the tells are:
- Full stop — Period. End of story. Full stop. The science is settled. Mic drop.
- Change of subject. Includes red herring arguments.
- Word salad.
- Invoking secret magical conspiracy theories. “Dog whistles”, “What they really mean”.
Dr. Robert Epstein has been studying the effect search engine bias can have on public opinion and public policy.
I share a lot of the concerns and goals of those who describe themselves as “socialists.” More health care and housing for poor people? Great. More educational opportunities for the least well-off? Absolutely. A cleaner environment ?
Source: Why I am Not a Socialist
I was notified that a comment I had posted was in violation of Facebook’s community standards.
This is the comment:
It never fails. If I write something about immigration or charity or anything related to helping someone else and dissent from the general leftists chorus of “We must have more government help”and “government must distribute the wealth” I’m held to be mean, evil, selfish, and just about the worst person in the world.
Source: Charity That Kills
And there are those who will eagerly take up the White Man’s Burden, and have to be blasted loose from it with dynamite.
America has never been fairer or more integrated, yet politicians obsess over wiping out discrimination.
Source: The Race Card Has Gone Bust
Your race card has been declined.
An Immigration and Customs Enforcement pilot of new rapid DNA testing at the border has found that nearly a third of those tested were not biologically related to the children in their custody.
ICE conducted the pilot for a few days earlier this month in El Paso and McAllen, Texas, finding about 30 per cent of those tested were not related to the children they claimed were their own, an official told the Washington Examiner.
The official said that these were not cases of step-fathers or adoptive parents.
‘Those were not the case. In these cases, they are misrepresented as family members,’ the official said.Daily Mail